Florida citrus growers reject EPA water rules
Fri, Apr 23 2010
* EPA proposal seen costing Florida agriculture billions
* Agency urged to set "reasonable" goals on nutrients
* EPA warns against "false choice" of health vs economy
By Tom Brown
MIAMI, April 23 (Reuters) - Plans by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency to clean up Florida's waterways set unattainable goals and would
saddle the state's farm industry with billions of dollars of costs it cannot
afford, Florida citrus growers said on Friday.
"There is no way Florida agriculture, including the $9 billion citrus
industry, can survive if the EPA actually follows through with their
proposal," said Michael Sparks, head of Florida Citrus Mutual, the state's
main citrus growers association.
"Of course we all want clean water, it is essential to our livelihood in
agriculture, but we need to set reasonable goals," Sparks said in a
statement.
New restrictions on the release of phosphorous and nitrogen, also known as
"nutrient" pollutants, into Florida's lakes and waterways could cost between
$855 million and $3 billion to implement, the statement said.
It cited a report issued on Thursday by the Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) that said recurring costs from the
EPA restrictions would total between $902 million and $1.6 billion per year,
with additional indirect economic impacts to the state of $1.15 billion
annually.
The EPA's proposals, which are open to public comment until the end of this
month, are in line with the agency's January 2009 determination that numeric
nutrient standards were needed in Florida to meet requirements of the Clean
Water Act.
The state, with an economy heavily dependent on tourism and recreational use
of its waterways, suffers from substantial water quality degradation due to
nutrient over-enrichment.
The EPA has said the problem is expected to worsen due to population growth
and land-use changes.
The FDACS report said the EPA had estimated the annual cost of compliance
with the restrictions on nutrient pollutants at about $35 million. But it
said that estimate was incomplete, both in terms of the estimated number of
agricultural acres affected and the methods used to determine the economic
impact.
The EPA did not respond specifically to the question raised by the FDACS
about its cost estimates.
But in a statement provided to Reuters, the agency said "clean and safe
waters are central to Florida's prosperity" as well as to people's health.
"We do not have to make a false choice between our health and the economy.
EPA is proposing a cost-effective rule to curb the impacts of nutrient
pollution that decimates property values and can cause costly illnesses,"
the EPA said.
"We are working closely with Floridians to make sure that these waters are
drinkable, fishable and swimmable, which then ensures a future for those
industries that want to prosper in Florida."